Data Intelligence – Study Patterns II
Data Intelligence – Study Patterns II
The takeaways
  • Our data found that: (1) veteran AdeptLR drillers typically spend less than 1 min on easy questions and slightly over 1 min on difficult questions; (2) slow and steady wins the race – users who have extended preparation periods and drill a lot outperform those who drill a lot within a short period; and (3) users often reach a plateau shortly after the one-thousand question mark - the key to overcoming the plateau is to persevere and keep drilling.

1. How much time should I spend on each question? 

Time pressure is what makes LR very challenging. In addition to knowing the answer to a question, you need to answer it quickly. That is why drilling is important. It is a way to build “muscle memory” and reduce reaction time. The key is to proportion the allotted time strategically to minimize the time spent on easy questions and maximize the time required to process difficult questions. Our data indicates that veteran AdeptLR drillers on average spend 47 seconds on easy questions, 60.5 seconds on moderately difficult questions and 76.4 seconds on the most difficult questions (see Chart 1a). Drilling is the key to improving timing. For every 200 questions a user drills, the average time spent on a question reduces by 3 seconds. In summary, consistent drilling is crucial not only for improving accuracy, as discussed in our last post, but it also improves speed! 

Consistent drillers typically spend slightly over a min on difficult questions.

An example of improvement in speed (reduction in time spent on questions) by number of questions drilled.

2. Can I take breaks from intensive drilling?

Insights obtained from LawHub data suggest that preparation lengths vary considerably among users, with an average preparation time of 125 days. Many drillers take study breaks in between. Discounting those breaks, on average, drillers are actively preparing for a length of 78 days. A common question our users ask is, “Should I drill intensively for a short period of time and is it okay to have a break in between?” Our data suggests that there is an advantage to taking your time to prepare and thereafter drilling as many questions as you can! 

We stratified users by the number of total questions drilled and whether they took study breaks. We compared the average improvement in correct responses in Timed Sections and found that in general, users who took study breaks and practiced a lot outperformed other users. Drilling a large number of questions within a short period of time did not appear beneficial. For example, for users who drilled over 1,500 questions, those who took study breaks averaged almost three more correct responses in Timed Sections than those who didn’t take such study breaks. In summary, take your time to prepare and drill – slow and steady wins the race. 

Users who take their time and drill a large volume of questions show the most improvement in timed sections. 

3.  Reaching a plateau?

LSAT preparation is a long journey and requires tenacity. Many people hit a plateau at some point, whereby your score does not seem to improve even with continuous practice. We found users tend to hit such a plateau shortly after they drilled over a thousand questions. Their average scored in Timed Sections lingered around -3 at that point. Upon reaching the plateau, some users continued to drill, and our data showed that if they were able to cross the two-thousand question threshold, their scores in Timed Sections would trend back up and reach -2 and -1 on average. Chart 3 shows an example of a user’s performance in Timed Sections. In short, hitting a plateau is very common. The key is to persevere and a breakthrough will come. 

In the next blog post (our final blog post of this series), we will go beyond data and share some test-taking tips on your LSAT test day. Stay tuned!

You may also like
Join our newsletter!

Subscribe our newsletter to receive the latest blog posts. No spam.

Subscribe